Google announced yesterday there will be a link spam update rolling out over the next two weeks.? In reading through the article announcing this update I started feeling hopeful this update will be focused on placing responsibility on the sites that are actively linking vs. taking a guess and penalizing those sites that are the recipients of these links. 5 years ago, I wrote an article on the Moz Blog with a theory on predicting Google’s intent and the impact unnatural outbound link penalties could have on the future of SEO.

In summary, the concept was simple… If you penalize the sites that are placing outbound links, you increase the market cost of placing links while simultaneously creating uncertainty in the marketplace regarding whether a link being purchased can/will actually pass any value.? Long game result is less sites buying links, less legit sites selling links, and probably more shadiness from sites dedicated to selling links.

It is irresponsible for Google to place penalties and blame on sites they think are purchasing links, as there is room for error that can have serious impacts/consequences on the lives of people who are completely oblivious to what is happening and why. Penalizing the link recipients also places the burden of proof on the (now struggling) business owners and requires substantial resources to eliminate doubt in the accuser, who bases their judgement on circumstantial evidence. The recipients of links ultimately have NO CONTROL over those that link to them or how they are linking. It stands to reason that if Google feels a site may be a participant in a link scheme, then the responsibility should rest on the site that does not appear to be appropriately managing their outbound link profile and is the source of “evidence” being used to make the determination.?

With a link source focused approach, outbound links are devalued, and if a site cares (though why would they?), then they can do the work to regain Google’s trust that their opinions/links have value that should be considered.? In reading through the recent article from Google, it did appear to be focused on highlighting your responsibilities as a webmaster linking to others, and reinforces the announcement from late 2019 regarding recommended use of rel=”sponsored” with incentivized content. This leads me to believe the penalty will be focused on the linking websites vs. the linked websites. Most notable is the statement from the article (below) which indicates that link spam will be nullified and that rankings will be impacted, which I read as the links will lose value and any inflated rankings that existed will deflate.

This algorithm update, which will rollout across the next two weeks, is even more effective at identifying and nullifying link spam more broadly, across multiple languages. Sites taking part in link spam will see changes in Search as those links are re-assessed by our algorithms. – Duy Nguyen via Google.com

With a focus on “penalizing” sites that have unnatural outbound links, it should bring a greater “Buyer Beware” to the link purchase market. Historically, these sorts of updates have just triggered more buzz in the link audit/purchase world on more things to review when determining if a site is a good neighborhood for link acquisition.? A fundamental flaw in all of this is the obvious fact that many link purchasers rely on DA, AR, UR, DR, ascore, citation flow, trust flow, topical trust flow, etc. etc. to determine if a link has value, and most all of these metrics can be gamed with just a few clever strategies.

In an ideal world, Google would start making penalties public information as part of their “About this result”. If a site had an outbound link penalty (or inbound, etc). This would offer many benefits…

  1. A user would know that Google has taken issue with this site, and that there may be some concern with the quality of the result or its content.
  2. This would put Google in a position to show strong discretion when deciding to actively penalize a site, as their judgements would be public.
  3. This would threaten the livelihood of sites that are linking to others, as there is not currently a way to to determine if a site has any outbound link penalties, which would eliminate any value in obtaining a link.
  4. This would force webmasters who are purchasing/scheming for links to consider whether their link strategies are worth the risk of having a site publicly flagged, which would further push sites from using link strategies that Google considers link schemes.

 

Good luck over the next few weeks, may your rankings live on ??



Suggested Reading on this Topic:
国色天香社区视频在线观看-草蜢视频在线观看www
长津湖 外交部回应拜登重申不支持台独 国际人士热议中共十九届六中全会 大连一密接者擅自点外卖聚餐被调查 大连一密接者擅自点外卖聚餐被调查 国际人士热议中共十九届六中全会 国际人士热议中共十九届六中全会 尚气与十环传奇 国际人士热议中共十九届六中全会 花木兰 大连现超级传播者26人在同一传播链 尚气与十环传奇 五个扑水的少年 24岁救人牺牲消防员获批为烈士 国际人士热议中共十九届六中全会 意大利错失直接晋级世界杯资格 突围 大连现超级传播者26人在同一传播链 北京冬奥火炬宣传片获金花环奖 国足最新出线概率0.08% 印度首都准备封城 林丹世界排名被正式移除 国足战澳大利亚大名单:4归化在列 200斤鳄鱼被吓后待水里溺死 星辰大海 林丹世界排名被正式移除 周冠宇成为中国首位F1车手 峰爆 北京冬奥火炬宣传片获金花环奖 中国医生 国足战澳大利亚大名单:4归化在列 甄嬛传 周冠宇成为中国首位F1车手 大连现超级传播者26人在同一传播链 十九届六中全会公报发布 你好李焕英 北京冬奥火炬宣传片获金花环奖 周冠宇成为中国首位F1车手 北京冬奥火炬宣传片获金花环奖 扫黑风暴 中美元首是否达成新共识?中方回应 男子写80页PPT拯救爱情却离婚 美人鱼 浦发银行回应近3亿存款莫名被质押 五个扑水的少年 中美元首会谈重点内容 安娜贝尔 意大利错失直接晋级世界杯资格 中美元首是否达成新共识?中方回应 男子体检血中抽出2升油浆 意大利错失直接晋级世界杯资格 周冠宇成为中国首位F1车手 林丹世界排名被正式移除 国足战澳大利亚大名单:4归化在列 中国共产党第三个历史决议全文发布 国足最新出线概率0.08% 灵媒 大连现超级传播者26人在同一传播链 长津湖 两个女人 罗永浩吐槽苹果文案没文化 罗永浩吐槽苹果文案没文化 浦发银行回应近3亿存款莫名被质押 男子体检血中抽出2升油浆 房价上涨城市创七年新低 拐点来了? 浦发银行回应近3亿存款莫名被质押 周冠宇成为中国首位F1车手 扫黑风暴 大连现超级传播者26人在同一传播链 中国医生 鱿鱼游戏
上高县| 南漳县| 兴海县| 石屏县| 西平县| 阜宁县| 闻喜县| 绥滨县| 临高县| 吕梁市| 南部县| 高邑县| 观塘区| 安义县| 肥乡县| 洛宁县| 玛纳斯县| 嵊泗县| 隆安县| 高唐县| 海门市| 信宜市| 青海省| 洪江市|